Feature
#4
Reflections on Recruitment
JESSICA is 25 years old and is single. She was enticed by her friends
working in Hong Kong to work here as domestic helper. After a while
she finally decided to do so. Her friend who was on annual leave brought
Jessica to the agency in Manila she herself used in coming to HK.
She was interviewed, given a form to fill in, and given the list of
requirements for her passport. She was told to bring the requirements
on a certain date together with the most important one so that her
papers will move: P30,000 as down payment. The balance, another P30,000,
is to be paid by cheques, arrangements will be made just before she
leaves.
She went back to the agency on the agreed date with the requirements
and of course, the money. Her family borrowed it from various sources,
at various interests. She was then vidoegraphed: front, side and back
and coached to say some words of greetings.
Months later the agency informed her that a prospective employer had
indeed been found. A few more weeks and the visa arrived. She was
instructed by the agency to open a checking account and issue a number
of post-dated cheques to cover the balance of thirty thousand pesos.
She did so.
But the Hong Kong of her imagination (mga akala) was not the Hong
Kong she experienced first hand. There was a constant conflict of
expectations between her employer and herself which eventually led
to a deteriorating relationship. Jessica began to fear the morrow
as it will be another day of reductive experiences. The situation
became unbearable. The workload she can cope with; it was the continually
demeaning epithets that bothered her no end. She wanted to terminate
the contract but she was worried of the cheques she had issued.
*****
MILDRED is, at 34, a mother of three. Her husband is a church minister
which does not provide a steady income. She used to be a teacher but
the growing family-size demanded more income. There were times when
her salary was delayed for months thus to fend for the family, she
resorted to borrowing from the school cashier who was a loan shark.
Whenever the money comes, it is barely enough to wipe off her debt-list.
She decided to come to Hong Kong. A friend introduced her to an agency
in the cabezera (provincial capital).
She completed all the forms. She waited for months. When the visa
arrived, she was told to take a loan for P50, 000 at the lending agency
next door assigning the placement agency as the recipient. No money
ever passed through her fingers nor were the documents given her.
Mildred endured the treatment she received from her employer. By the
time she finished her contract she had lost 20 lbs. She has repaid
the lending agency. Her current employer is a bit of an improvement
over her first.
*****
LORNA, with five children, was approached by a childhood friend who
is working in Hong Kong. She can help her find a job. She pities Lorna,
she said. Her friend however, asked her to fork in five thousand pesos,
for miscellaneous expenses. Lorna, after procuring the amount from
different sources, did so. A few months later, her friend who has
come back to HK sent her a letter telling her to report to a specified
agency as she had found her a prospective employer. After filling
up various forms and submitting a list of requirements, which of course
took some time to prepare, she waited for the visa to come through.
She was told down-payment is P15,000 but once she starts working she
will have to pay the principal agency HKD7,000.
Months later Lorna did enter Hong Kong. She was met by an agency representative
at the airport and was brought to the agency boarding house. The following
day, they were brought to the Immigration Department to apply for
their HK ID Card. Straight from the ID, after the Temporary ID was
issued, they were brought to a lending agency to apply for a loan
to pay the balance. She contracted a loan of HKD18,000 payable in
eight months well above what she needed. However that was the minimum
the lending agency allows. She is still paying the loan.
Her friend also keeps on borrowing money from her - after all she
helped her find the job - an accounting of her debt of gratitude (utang
na loob). Suffice it to say, she is never repaid.
What ever forces or motivates a Filipino to work overseas, makes her/him
a victim of illegal recruitment. What many do not realize - many take
it to be the normal way - is that exorbitant and excessive fees -
fees well above what is required by law, constitute illegal recruitment.
Whatever indignities they experience in the work-sites, they are torn
between the imperative to keep the their jobs and keeping their dignity.
They realize that they, and all others, are on the one hand, hostages
to recruitment agencies they approached in the Philippines and the
two-week rule imposed by the Hong Kong Immigration Department on the
other. Their desire to keep whatever sense of dignity left in them
has become least priority because they are trapped.
Only a few dare tackle these agencies head-on, and fewer still persist,
let alone succeed. The long, tedious and expensive legal processes
discourage the Davids who have the courage to face the Goliaths of
recruitment agencies.
2,000 OFW's leave the Philippines daily. There are now something like
7M documented (and undocumented OFW's) deployed world-wide. According
to UN estimates they contribute USD8B annually to the Philippine economy.
The OFW's as a sector, is the second biggest contributor to the Philippine
economy. Thus in recognition, they are called Mga Bagong Bayani -
the new (economic) heroes and heroines - an ascription first used
by Pres. Aquino. It is crystal clear therefore that the government
benefits tremendously from the Labor Export Program.
Previous Philippine governments had always professed to protect migrant
workers. RA 4082, The Magna Carta for Overseas Contract Workers was
passed into law. The reality is, these are empty rhetorics. A simple
case in point: the POEA has only eight legal officers to handle complaints
brought to its attention: 7,000 in 1997 alone. Another nullifying
factor is the implementation of Memorandum Circular 41 of the POEA
which grants among other things the right to arbitrate frictions between
the helper and the employer to the recruitment agency.
The OFW is clearly one of the most vulnerable member, not only of
the receiving society, but also of the Philippine society as well.
The Labor Export Policy of the Philippine government victimizes them
without end.
|
|
 |
| |
| Search
our site:
|
| |
| |
| |
|